• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

2016 Cleveland Indians

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Except for, y'know, the Native Americans who want him gone and are at the home opener EVERY SINGLE YEAR.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...f-wahoo-logo-at-cleveland-indians-home-opener
Who cares what like 8 people think.

If they don't like the franchise then don't support it. Move on with your life and stop letting something as immaterial as a professional sports franchise team name upset you.

I also think it's funny when people on the keep the chief side (which I am firmly on) say it is a tribute to them. It's not. And who the hell cares that it isn't.
 
Last edited:
Who cares what like 8 people think.

If they don't like the franchise then don't support it. Move on with your life and stop letting something as immaterial as a professional sports franchise team name upset you.

I also don't think it's funny when people on the keep the chief side (which I am firmly on) say it is a tribute to them. It's not. And who the hell cares that it isn't.

If you're trolling, then bravo.
 
"A survey conducted in 2002 by The Harris Poll for Sports Illustrated (SI) found that 81 percent of Native Americans who live outside traditional Indian reservations and 53 percent of Indians on reservations did not find the images discriminatory. The authors of the article concluded that "Although most Native American activists and tribal leaders consider Indian team names and mascots offensive, neither Native Americans in general nor a cross section of U.S. sports fans agree. "

"More recent surveys, rather than addressing the larger issue, have targeted the controversy over the name of the Washington Redskins, asking if the word is offensive or if it should be changed. By a large majority (71-89 percent), public opinion has maintained that the name should not change, but when additional questions were asked also have found that the same respondents said "redskin" is not an appropriate term for Native Americans."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_mascot_controversy#Public_opinion_surveys


I'm not sure I understand what you are doing here.

Sure, SOME Native Americans don't care, but others do. So when you make a blanket statement that "The people that want Chief Wahoo gone aren't Native Americans" that is wrong.

Sure, SOME of the people who want him gone are not Native Americans, but SOME of them are.
 
I accidentally put a "don't" in my post, and have since edited.

I trust this clears up any confusion, and remedies the situation.

Classic nanny state "feelings."

Yeah, Chief Wahoo should hurt their feelings. Maybe if they weren't such pussies and stood up to the white man they wouldn't all nearly be dead now.

Bout time they stopped being so sensitive about our "insensitive" and "racist" depiction of what Indians look like, and enjoy the casino empire and land we gave them.
 
Classic nanny state "feelings."

Yeah, Chief Wahoo should hurt their feelings. Maybe if they weren't such pussies and stood up to the white man they wouldn't all nearly be dead now.

Bout time they stopped being so sensitive about our "insensitive" and "racist" depiction of what Indians look like, and enjoy the casino empire and land we gave them.
Agreed.
 
Good thing I bought a Wahoo hat two years ago. The people who want Chief Wahoo gone aren't even Native Americans, they're people who think Natives want him gone.
Not 100 true at all. http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/apr/11/native-americans-protest-chief-wahoo-logo-at-cleveland-indians-home-opener
Native Americans are a very small percentage of the US population, so of course many who want the logo changed will not be Native American since those numbers are in the millions who now oppose Native Americans being used as sports logos, but there have been Native Americans protesting all the way back to games at the old stadium. I recall an opener in the 90's with a few hundred on opening day at Municipal/

Growing up I loved the Logo, but I can def see why people have a problem with it. I actually think the Dolans are handling this situation well to some extent.
 
"A survey conducted in 2002 by The Harris Poll for Sports Illustrated (SI) found that 81 percent of Native Americans who live outside traditional Indian reservations and 53 percent of Indians on reservations did not find the images discriminatory.

So 47% - almost half - of Indians on reservations DID find the images discriminatory...but Native Americans "in general" don't take offense...????
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top