That would make Boston pretty damn good.
I still have yet to see one credible shred of information linking Hayward to Boston. So far the only thing I've encountered is blind fan speculation based on "ZOMG HAYWARD IS A FREE AGENT BOSTONNN". Why leave one promising core (4th seed in the West after an extended hiatus from the postseason) for another?Celtics getting Butler and Hayward/ George would be huge.
But the bigger thing for me is the Sixers getting Fultz. Fultz-Simmons-Embiid-Saric is a hell of a core moving forward. If they can stay healthy, five years from now, Sixers will be kings of the East.
Its a good trade for Philly imo. They don't really need Josh Jackson. But getting another ball-handler/elite-guard who can also play off the ball would really add to their core big time.
But, I don't understand the thought-process of Boston behind this. Why do they need Josh Jackson when they already have someone like Jaylen Brown. There are some rumours about them looking to flip those picks for Jimmy Butler. Now, that would make sense for Boston but why would Bulls do that? It would be idiotic!
Fuck the 6ers. What they did was so bad for the league. I'm ok with tanking a few years, but they tanked for like 7 years in a row and whenever players started to actually make a contribution on the floor they went down with "injuries"
I think Simmons could have played last year, I thinks embiid could have played significantly more, and I think it's horse shit what the 6ers do. Hope they never sniff a conference title
Why would it be awful for the Bulls to get a treasure trove of picks for Butler? They need to push the reset button.
Why would it be awful for the Bulls to get a treasure trove of picks for Butler? They need to push the reset button.