Bell isn't exactly a downhill runner. More of a patient, hesitation, pick your spots type runner. I would think Barkley could be that type of a back.Good down hill running backs do make a difference.
This is why the Browns should avoid Barkley and grab someone who can accomplish that.
The greatest backs have patience and vision. Barkley's problem is that he tends to want to hit a home run every carry, so he'll dance around sometimes instead of hitting it up inside for a short gain. Lots of young backs do that. Most grow out of it with coaching.
I would rather count on that than a purely downhill runner who will only hit it up inside for a short gain at the expense of finding big play opportunities.
I can think of a whole lot of very young successful backs who didn't do that, though. Zeke didn't. Fournette didn't. Bell didn't, etc., etc., etc.. Drafting someone on the premise that they have to change their running style seems rather dicey when you're talking about a top 4 pick in the draft.
So would I. But the thing is, there are guys who already can do both. They can break runs for large gains, and hit seams hard to maximize yardage on the plays where it can't be taken to the house. That's vision. Not only having the physical ability to make big plays, but being able to see them set up and recognize how to get the maximum yards out of every play.
To put it differently, would you honestly say Barklely has demonstrated that he has elite field vision? Is he elite at reading and setting up blocks? Because I don't see that. I see a guy who is absolutely elite physically.
just in case anyone was thinking there might be something worth watching in this video, there isn't.
just in case anyone was thinking there might be something worth watching in this video, there isn't.
triplethreat you alright bro? This is getting odd
Barstool is complete fucking trash.Not a barstool pizza review guy?