Agree with SDP with Bagley/Randle. I think Randle is the closest thing to him that's currently in the NBA. Bagley with more athleticism, but Randle the better defender. Kind of interesting that I'm lower on Bagley than most, and the same is true for Randle when he came into the NBA and during his first couple of years lol.
But this year I've done a complete 180 on Randle. If you put him on a team with a high end primary ball handler then he'd be pretty unstoppable in the P&R. I know there's been flashes of it, but I don't buy into Bagley's quick decision making being at a super high level. Not at Randle's level right now.
And also we've not seen Randle in the playoffs yet. That's one of my main concerns with Bagley, is how teams will attack him when they specifically game plan for him. That's when you get into the conversation of how Bagley/Randle need certain types of players around them to hide their weaknesses. It becomes a game of "if's" that I never get comfortable with. But it's also worth pointing out that I was a little lower on Lauri Markkanen because I probably overvalued this sort of thing. I think I've brought it up in here before, but I expected Markkanen's offensive abilities to be negated against a switch-heavy defense, something he'll see a ton of in the playoffs. I still expect that to be the case, and he is playing next to a guy that can hide a ton of his weaknesses (Lopez)