Criznit
Ack Ack
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2020
- Messages
- 11,665
- Reaction score
- 10,144
- Points
- 123
Diamondbacks reject those 1 for 1 deals. Well I would if I am them.getting back to the subject of how the Guardians keep DDLS, it comes down to what do the DBax need to improve a world series participating club???
The changes made by their GM, Mike Hazen, are "said" to addresss ALL their needs: "...Hazen went out and acquired third baseman Eugenio Suárez, outfielder/DH Joc Pederson, left-hander Eduardo Rodriguez and outfielder Randal Grichuk..." So a corner IF'er with pop, two out fielders and, perhaps, the best SP signed in the offseason from the Guardians' perspective.. That is..the Guardians won't get many chances to face E-Rod [yippee].. Suarez would have had DDLS as his possible early season back up.. The need still exists.. The guys the DBax have in their system (Lawler, Alexander, others) just aren't ready or won't be.. There's no reason to believe DDLS would have been considered ready, as well.. The other two guys play in spots the Guardians can offer very little..
So, we'll have to go on the theory that you can never have enough pitching and catching.. Would you consider Lavastida or David Fry as a possible trade candidate for keeping DDLS?.. imho.. it's a clear overpay.. but.. how much does the CleFO really like DDLS??
Thoughts?
DDLS has premium value at the moment and that doesn't help us at all.
If I am the Dbacks, I'm thinking Aleman, Tena, Hankins, Frias, etc...
Last edited: