BimboColesHair
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2011
- Messages
- 22,703
- Reaction score
- 59,121
- Points
- 148
What's your definition of "extended look" though, that is very much the question. You can keep laughing away at my posts (very mature btw), but you're not tackling any of my arguments.
This already is very much an extended look that many never even get in MLB. If he gets another half season because an 80 wRc+ is tease enough, then we're already in the extended look 2.0 phase. The most likely scenario is that he continues to be an 80ish wRc+ hitter, and then? Keep extending that look? Players like Arias (much like Urshela) may need a couple of years to fully blossom. Are we willing to go through a couple of bad years and jettison all other MIF in the process?
This is the question, and one you and the FO keep punting down the line. The "he has done enough to keep looking" argument is a valid one in a vacuum, but that's not the situation here.
And we're not even discussing who helps most to win now, since we're supposed to aim for the postseason next year.
I'd at least hope they go into ST with an open competition since Arias simply hasn't captured this opportunity (and simply hasn't improved since Amed left, which was the big argument then) , so why hand it to him again?
More than 152 PAs.
You yourself are contexting Rocchio's current poor MLB sample size due to an inconsistent role, yet you aren't doing the same for Arias. This is why people are getting frustrated with you.
Or do you think him bouncing from RF to 1B to 3B to SS game to game or just platooning him against LHP like we did earlier this season is the same as him getting an extended look at just SS? If so, I would love to breakdown how wrong that is.