• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

A Closer Look at Jared Sullinger

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Steve_424

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
10,595
Reaction score
13,251
Points
123
Per request from a few Buckeye fans...

Age: 18
Height: 6'9"
Weight: 286
College: Ohio State
Position: Power Forward

NBA Comparisons


Al Jefferson, Kevin Love, Paul Millsap, Luis Scola, Elton Brand, Lamar Odom

Background

Sullinger's father Satch was National High School Coach of the Year. Sullinger said he likes to have "Twitter battles" with friend Kendall Marshall

Scouting Report

From NBADraft.net

Strengths: Sullinger has decent size for a post player measuring 6’9” (in shoes) with a 6’11.5” wingspan … He is a bruising throwback post player that uses his 262 pound body to create angles for his shot and to clear space on the boards … Very physical player that uses his body to wear down opposing big men...The Ohio State commit is also very skilled with a repertoire of advanced post moves for a high school player…Comfortable finishing around the rim with either hand … Has excellent hands and footwork and shows very good touch around the basket … Solid rebounder, he attacks the glass at both ends of the floor and creates offensive opportunities off of putbacks…Shows decent form and touch on the 12-18 footer … Passes well out of the post … He’s a winner, leading his Columbus Northland squad to an Ohio Divison 1 state championship and his All-Ohio Red AAU squad to three consecutive National Championships.

Weaknesses: Does not possess elite athleticism…Is prone to having his shot blocked and has some difficulty with longer athletic defenders…Does not run the floor extremely well…Shows ability, but needs to improve consistency of mid-range jumper...Lateral quickness is lacking, creating defensive mismatches versus perimeter oriented PFs…Is not a particularly dominant defensive player due to lack of explosiveness and quickness…Weight could be a long-term issue, not a particularly solid 262 pounds…Potential one-and-done lottery guy, but must improve conditioning and mid-range game and show that he can dominate at the college level.

From NBADraftExpress


The biggest change we've seen from Sullinger over the years revolves around his body, as he's slimmed down considerably from when we first saw him. He still hasn't reached his maximum physical potential, but the strides he's made are very encouraging and show that he's willing to put the time in and make the sacrifices needed.

While Sullinger continued to show more and more perimeter skills every time we saw him in high school, he's been primarily an inside threat for Ohio State this season. This makes sense from both an individual and team standpoint, as he's flashing a highly coveted skill from an NBA perspective—a polished back to the basket game—and has proven to be downright unstoppable for college defenders. This is a big reason why his team hasn't missed a beat from last season despite the loss of last year's 2nd overall pick, Evan Turner.

40% of Sullinger's offense comes in post-up situations according to Synergy Sports Technology, and he ranks amongst the most efficient back to the basket players in the NCAA, scoring on over 50% of his field goal attempts when creating his own shot inside and getting fouled on nearly a quarter of his possessions.

The biggest key to Sullinger's dominance has been the opposition's inability to keep him outside of the paint. While he's lost a good deal of weight, he's still retained all of the strength in his lower body that makes him so difficult to handle one on one. With his terrific base and low center of gravity, Sullinger is constantly working to establish better post-position down low. Tough and extremely aggressive, he's not afraid to simply put his ass into a defender and go to work until he gets to where he wants to on the floor.

Once there, he has incredibly soft hands to catch pretty much anything thrown his way and an unbelievable awareness for where he is on the court relative to his teammates and opponents. Patient and confident, he has extremely polished footwork and excellent body control, showing a wide array of spins and counter-moves that help him create even higher percentage shots. With his feathery touch and ability to shoot with either hand, he doesn't miss very often despite the fact that he's rarely getting his shot off over the top of the defense. When the double-team inevitably comes, he's extremely quick to recognize rotations and does a very good job of finding open teammates spotting up on the wing.

Sullinger's hands are never more impressive than when watching him operate on the offensive glass. With his wide frame, solid length (7-1 ½ wingspan), excellent fundamentals boxing out and terrific timing anticipating where loose balls will end up, Sullinger already has a major advantage over opponents. The fact that he has magnets for hands make him a Kevin Love-like force of a rebounder at the college level, though, ranking him #1 by a wide margin amongst freshmen in this category, and 7th overall on a per-minute basis. Even though he gets his shot blocked a decent amount, he's got such great instincts that he's often able to follow up and get himself a good look after quickly snagging the loose ball.

Sullinger is very effective diving to the rim and finishing for many of the same exact reasons, giving him great potential as an off the ball threat as well. While we rarely see Ohio State run much pick and roll action due to their lack of personnel (their guards aren't great shot-creators), Sullinger could be very effective in this area, as he not only has great hands, but is also a fairly quick leaper if able to catch the ball in the stride. From stand-still situations Sullinger is very much a below the rim guy, but we've seen him be extremely effective running the floor in transition and finishing drive and dish plays this year, giving us reason to believe that he could be an excellent weapon in the NBA half-court alongside a dynamic point guard.

Strictly an inside player early on in his high school career, Sullinger showed more and more potential as a perimeter shooter every time we saw him over the past three years. That's yet to manifest itself at the college level thus far, as he's only attempted six jump-shots this season. With his excellent mechanics, soft touch and strong work ethic, it's reasonable to assume that he will at least develop into a capable mid-range, if not a 3-point shooter, down the road. He's already an above average free throw shooter (67%) for a freshman big man.

Not an exceptional athlete, and slightly undersized standing somewhere between 6-8 and 6-9, Sullinger will need to continue to work on his body and expand his offensive arsenal if he's to translate his scoring production from college to the NBA. While he makes the most of his physical tools, Sullinger is not very quick or explosive compared to some of the more athletic power forwards he'll match up with on a nightly basis, making it important for him to keep himself in peak physical condition and maximize the tools he does possess. If he can polish up his face-up game and improve his ability to attack defenders off the dribble, he'll be that much more effective in the low post.

On the defensive end is where NBA teams are bound to have the most questions about Sullinger's potential. Undersized to play the center position he's ideally suited for, and lacking the lateral quickness to keep up with perimeter oriented power forwards, Sullinger will probably never be a first-team all-defender type. He's smart enough to not be a liability down the road, but has definitely struggled at times this season, being taken advantage of off the dribble in one-on-one situations, sometimes against very average opponents.

Sullinger offers very little presence as a shot-blocker around the basket, isn't using his length to contest opponents' shots, and isn't doing a good enough job of being physical and using his body to his advantage defensively early on in his college career. His focus and intensity-level seems to waver, and he's not nearly as fundamentally sound here as he is on the offensive end of the floor. This is where freshmen tend to struggle the most with the transition from high school to the NCAA, and Sullinger is no exception thus far.

While not possessing the same long-term upside of some of the other big men prospects in this draft, such as Perry Jones or John Henson, Sullinger is clearly not a finished product at age 18. He looks much more ready to step in and play from day one, though, which has to be deemed attractive for the worst teams in the NBA that will be picking first in the draft. Despite his limitations, players in Sullinger's mold, such as Kevin Love, Paul Millsap and Luis Scola have proven to be extremely effective in today's NBA. Add in his outstanding intangibles—he has a winner's mentality, is highly intelligent and appears to be an excellent teammate—and you're talking about one of the safer bets in the draft.

Intangibles

From NBADraftExpress

With his excellent motor and insatiable hunger to score, Sullinger doesn't relent for even a minute when he's on the court, putting a tremendous amount of pressure on the opposition to alter their game-plan to stop him, fouling out entire frontcourts, and getting his team into the bonus early and often.

My Take


There's a lot to love about Sullinger. Those around say he's very intelligent, is a great teammate, and has a non-stop motor. He has continued to get better throughout this season, and has the potential to be a very good NBA big man. Most scouting reports say that he'll be one of the most NBA-ready players in next year's draft. Having confidence in him, at the very worst, being a solid NBA starter has to instill confidence in potential lottery teams looking at Sullinger. He's not my top choice, but he wouldn't be a bad consolation prize if Irving is off the board when the Cavaliers pick.
 
i honestly have not watched a minute of college basketball yet this season so what keeps this guy only from being a top 5 pick where as irving seems to be a top 2 pick? is he just not tall enough to be considered a legit big man? they both seem to lack the total athleticism everyone always wants to see, so what are there biggest differences?

edit: as to not sound like a retard, i know they play difference positions. so obviously one of their differences is they play difference positions
 
Last edited:
His body - he's a little short, a little wide and a little flabby (used to be a whole lot flabby)....that being said, I <3 Sullinger
 
i honestly have not watched a minute of college basketball yet this season so what keeps this guy only from being a top 5 pick where as irving seems to be a top 2 pick? is he just not tall enough to be considered a legit big man? they both seem to lack the total athleticism everyone always wants to see, so what are the biggest differences?

Most reports I have read claim that Irving has a higher ceiling.
 
If Sullinger were a couple of inches taller he'd probably be the consensus #1 pick. His height combined with not being an explosive athlete gives him some trouble finishing in traffic and over double teams. It also prevents him from being the menacing defensive force at the rim that you'd like to see from an elite big.

That being said, he does everything else at an extremely high level. He has nice touch on his shots, a WIDE body that he uses intelligently, and tremendous rebounding instincts. He has also shown to be a willing passer.

I think Kevin Love is a fair comparison for him at this point.
 
For your enjoyment:

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QLduYsEyEhk?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QLduYsEyEhk?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>


<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m7Nlrpxo390?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m7Nlrpxo390?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>



What a of lot people might not know, is that Jared Sullinger handled the ball quite a bit in high school and even brought the ball up the court half the time. He is also a decent shooter too. What this means; he can do more than just score inside, he has some versatility to his game, more than what he has shown at OSU so far.
 
I didn't know Sullinger had range.
 
i honestly have not watched a minute of college basketball yet this season so what keeps this guy only from being a top 5 pick where as irving seems to be a top 2 pick? is he just not tall enough to be considered a legit big man? they both seem to lack the total athleticism everyone always wants to see, so what are there biggest differences?

edit: as to not sound like a retard, i know they play difference positions. so obviously one of their differences is they play difference positions

His defense and his projected defensive abilities vs NBA PF's.
 
Picking Sullinger is really dependent on a lot of things, in my mind: whether or not Irving comes out, where the Cavs are picking and how JJ progresses the rest of the season...

Unless some people think Sullinger can really become a lot better than Hickson can/is then it seems like a bit of a waste picking him..

It's early so I can't completely speak for/against drafting Sullinger but that's the first thing that needs to be answered...

It would be cool though to draft Sullinger considering his deep Ohio roots, albeit in Columbus...
 
Picking Sullinger is really dependent on a lot of things, in my mind: whether or not Irving comes out, where the Cavs are picking and how JJ progresses the rest of the season...

Unless some people think Sullinger can really become a lot better than Hickson can/is then it seems like a bit of a waste picking him..

It's early so I can't completely speak for/against drafting Sullinger but that's the first thing that needs to be answered...

It would be cool though to draft Sullinger considering his deep Ohio roots, albeit in Columbus...

ONLY IF Irving doesn't come out, I would probably draft Sullinger...move Hickson to Center and have Sullinger at Power Forward. Seems Hickson has been playing pretty well at Center.
 
At OSU Sullinger is having to tone down is overall game in order for OSU to win. He's pretty much strictly a paint player and playing the center position. He gets away with being really good at it in college but it wouldn't go very well in the NBA. He would be able to expand his game greatly at PF. He will still be able to post up at PF. He ccould beat many PF's in the NBA right now in the paint. The NBA will allow him to handle the ball on the perimeter and also shoot out there. He can certainly do both.

If Irving doesn't come out or already off the board, it would be hard to pass up Sullinger. We'll know much more as this season goes along. If OSU can go far in the tourney and make it to the finals, Sullinger's value most likely goes up more.

One thing not mentioned is that many times these kids do in fact grow an inch or two more after high school. What if Sullinger grows two inches?
 
ONLY IF Irving doesn't come out, I would probably draft Sullinger...move Hickson to Center and have Sullinger at Power Forward. Seems Hickson has been playing pretty well at Center.

This team is screwed if it tries to make JJ the starting center. It's ok in the short term, since the team isn't going anywhere at this point anyway, but it won't work in the long-term.
 
i honestly have not watched a minute of college basketball yet this season so what keeps this guy only from being a top 5 pick where as irving seems to be a top 2 pick? is he just not tall enough to be considered a legit big man? they both seem to lack the total athleticism everyone always wants to see, so what are there biggest differences?

edit: as to not sound like a retard, i know they play difference positions. so obviously one of their differences is they play difference positions
Irving is definitely athletic. I have not read any scouting report or watched him on TV that suggests that he's not.
 
i honestly have not watched a minute of college basketball yet this season so what keeps this guy only from being a top 5 pick where as irving seems to be a top 2 pick? is he just not tall enough to be considered a legit big man? they both seem to lack the total athleticism everyone always wants to see, so what are there biggest differences?

edit: as to not sound like a retard, i know they play difference positions. so obviously one of their differences is they play difference positions

Irving is athletic, just by watching his highlights videos you can clearly see he is fast as **** with the ball and he can jump, he also is not small for a PG by any means...he is not Rose/Wall athletic but that really doesn't mean anything.
 
Irving is athletic, just by watching his highlights videos you can clearly see he is fast as **** with the ball and he can jump, he also is not small for a PG by any means...he is not Rose/Wall athletic but that really doesn't mean anything.

I think he is closer to Chris Paul than Rose, Wall or Westbrook. He has excellent vision, he can score and make his teammates better.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top