It was great because we had Lebron and Kyrie; that however does not mean that we couldn't have produced a better offense if Lebron was used more as a cutter and a roll man...because Lebron is better at both than he is at Isolation.
The fact is that Lebron is elite at every single playtype, especially when he is surrounded by such prolific shooters, so we would have produced elite offense regardless of what we ran...it's just that we needed more than that against a team like the Warriors. Playing Iso from the perimeter against them is exactly what they wanted us to do...without Irving at least.
Yes, he is. But the crux of the issue is this: Would playing the way you suggest IMPROVE an already all time offense (even showed glimpses this year with the second best playoff offense ever in a series against the Raps) ENOUGH to beat GS? Statistically, its highly, highly unlikely that we could improve the already really high ceiling offense enough to then topple GS, a team that has a great offense, TWO generational talents, AND a great defense. I think we have a decent shot against anyone else (underdogs against Houston from this year, too).
I agree that less LeBron ISO and more of him as a roll man and off of cuts would lead to an even better offense,
but having watched Bron so long, there’s a rhyme and reason to some of his ISO ball. I think playing that helps him set up the chess pieces to create open three point opportunities. One possession gets the defense doing X and then another possession gives the defense another look from the same set. He’s a savant and the end total seems to be more then the sum of its parts.
It’s also unrealistic to have a heavy amount of the offense be based off of Bron cuts or as the roll man as the defense will adjust and I’m not sure I trust whoever has the ball to make the right reads.
The Cavs were 9th in frequency of cuts at 7.4% of all plays last year, so they did cut.
1. Warriors, 12.3%
2. Sixers, 9.1% (massive difference between 1st and 2nd)
9. Cavs, 7.4% (657 cuts made and man passed to)
23. Spurs, 6.3% (549 cuts made)
26. Celtics, 6.0% (521 cuts made)
LeBron not as much, but if you have an offense based on Bron cutting to the basket...teams will adjust. Look at the PPP on cuts for everyone. It’s really high, but that's because teams don’t expect them out of most teams’ normal sets. I don’t think it’s possible to create the offense with that. It’s more feasible to to have more Bron as a roll guy, but that, too, would be more limited offense and rely heavily on the ball handler. Who, do you trust on this team to make the right reads if teams choose to blitz the PG like the Heat used to Do?
The thing is, a Bron ISO COULD turn into an open three for someone IF the actions work out that way. Now, people might argue: Why not incorporste both and make them the offense?Maybe they have a point. But to create those offenses that the Cavs did, to me, given the pieces they had and the ages they had, it had to be a constant dose of LeBron Ball. It’s hard to imagine a case in which it’s diluted LeBron Ball mixed with a another system of someone else handling the ball and creating the offense. It could work if we had the right guy. Watch those 2016 to 2017 playoffs games (and against Toronto this year); everyone runs the plays and actions to get to their spots off of LeBron’s actions and it’s based on timing and repetition and frankly, LeBron’s genius. People think that you can just have LeBron break down defenses and find those players. Sometimes that’s true, but take a look at the screens TT set for Kyrie and Love, and how Kyrie would screen for LeBron and LeBron for Kyrie. That 1/4 pick and role was so good with the three around them setting picks and moving to spots where they’re hit with a perfect pass and able to shoot.
The rhythm and timing in 2016/2017...don’t know if we get there without the possessions in Bron’s hands.
Even this year, the offense was great with Love at the 5 and without DRose and his ilk playing. 600+minutes, 122.2 ORtg. Warriors had 1,000+ minutes with Curry/KD/Klay at 123.3. It’s very, very, very difficult to make an objective case that the offense would be that much better playing Bron more off the ball.