- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,252
- Reaction score
- 64,937
- Points
- 148
I wouldn't know the guy exists if people weren't quoting and engaging him. I have to view ignored posts to scroll back and see what everyone is arguing about.
I believe the ignore feature should be used so that individual posters can ignore particular people who get under their skin, but with whom others have no problem. I've got two people on ignore because for whatever reason, I can't seem to have a decent conversation with them. But plenty of others do, so the solution is for me to ignore, and for those others to engage. In other words, I use ignore when the problem is me, not them.
I don't think the ignore feature should be used as essentially a moderation tool to sideline someone who virtually nobody likes. When you have someone like that, I think the solution is to get rid of them. Because inevitably, some posters won't have the guy on ignore, and so you get thread derailment or ridiculous conversations.
If someone wants to step up and make a case for why @CSF is not a negative contributor to the site, that's fine. Otherwise...why not just flush the turd away rather than just keep spraying air freshener and let the thing stink indefinitely?