• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

News, Articles, and Random Stuff about LeBron

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Looks photoshopped. Look at the wonky angle of the lettering on his shirt. Plus I'm almost certain I read yesterday about Lebron doing the pledge with his hand over his heart.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Looks photoshopped? I swear you'll say anything you fucking apologist. I want to see that article you read and it will only be credible if it's not written by an ESPN writer and there is another copy of this image before it was altered as you say
 
Business as usual for LeBron and Maverick

By Adrian Wojnarowski

LeBron James is right. Race probably played a part in some of the searing summer criticism heaped upon him. This wasn’t much of a revelation to most of us, and it shouldn’t be controversial. And yet, without context, without expansion, it predictably hit the news cycle like a tsunami.

Race is the story, but it isn’t the issue. This is: With everyone else pushing past LeBron’s July foolery, why did he let his business manager, Maverick Carter, drag him into another guaranteed losing referendum on “The Decision?”

As much as ever, James needs to rely on an America that confuses victory with virtue. He just needs the ball in his hands and mere mortals crumbling beneath him. His redemption comes with the basketball season, not awkward, out-of-context sound bites on race relations. LeBron James needs to be associated with Dwyane Wade(notes) and Chris Bosh(notes) and Pat Riley – not Carter.

James was moving past the summer in a natural way, and somehow his handlers have gone and made a mess of everything again.

With James, less is more. With Carter, less is too much.

Carter ought to stop crowding James on a stage where’s there’s no room for him, no good use. After all, this wasn’t about a belated damage control for LeBron, but for Maverick. Carter crafted a hit-and-run that would work to restore his crumbled standing in the marketing world. Carter wanted to change the dialogue on “The Decision” for his own good, not James’.

Yet, LeBron takes the hit again and again for his loyalty to this wrecking crew that surrounds him. They thrust James into a no-win situation, and it set him back again. And Carter? He slips back into the shadows until his next round of one-on-ones and photo spreads with Forbes and Fortune.

Purposely lost in it all, Carter slipped in some kind of half-assed admission about the television show that “the execution could’ve been a little better.” Yes, so could’ve the Bay of Pigs and the Faber College homecoming parade. This way, Carter’s on record with a vague notion of contrition, but the race angle steals the headlines and he never truly has to answer for his incompetence.

If James was committed to becoming a messenger, a crusader, for the double standards applied to NBA players, this all would’ve been a welcome entrée into that conversation. But he wanted no part of it. He ran away from his comments at Heat practice on Thursday. James doesn’t have the staying power to be the cornerstone of the discussion. This interview wasn’t orchestrated for him to make a stand, to speak his mind. Carter used James as a human shield, the way they used those Boys & Girls Club kids back in July. Hey, you can’t rip our self-aggrandizing motives for this hideous “Decision” when we’re raising money for foosball tables and new backboards.

What James says has merit – basketball players are treated far more harshly in the general public. To say that stereotypes of race don’t factor into the debate because Charles Barkley and Michael Jordan and whatever scores of African-Americans were critical of his act has no merit. There was still an element of society – free of logic, free of valid points – that will judge him poorly because of his race.

The stereotypes surrounding the NBA are part of common vernacular, and some people don’t even realize they’re using them. In hockey, they call you a tough guy, an enforcer. In the NBA, you’re a thug, a punk. In football, players get tattoos, long hair and become cult heroes. In the NBA, that makes you a breakdown in society.

There are double standards, and, yes, James paid a price for them. Many more have paid far worse. And as long as James and Carter are truthful with themselves and understand why so many fair-minded and intelligent people had issues with them over the summer, they could’ve intelligently introduced this into the debate.

It isn’t easy to be a young African-American business manager of one of the world’s most famous athletes. Carter has his own handlers propping him up in trade publications with flattering stories about his so-called innovative marketing genius. On CNN, he suggested people were uneasy with something that looked different, someone who did things differently. Maybe so, but it doesn’t account for the way he’s taken a sledgehammer to James’ image.

Carter’s been innovative with marketing LeBron the way Turtle was innovative with tequila. Maverick’s invited closer inspection of his self-proclaimed genius and the results have been unflattering. The irony of James leaving Aaron Goodwin several years ago was that his old agent ended up cultivating one of the bright, young minds of the digital marketing age, Nate Jones. Jones works with Kevin Durant now, and, well, Carter could learn a few lessons from a riser even younger than him.

Maverick Carter didn’t drag James onto CNN to work on the basketball star’s image. He brought him out there to start his own rehab tour. LeBron committed no crime in July except vanity and a callousness toward Cleveland. He took his share of grief and made it to Miami’s training camp, and deep down he had to know that contrition for his trespasses on ESPN wouldn’t be found on CNN.

The solution is still simple: Give LeBron the ball, get out of his way and watch him make it all right again. This won’t help Maverick Carter, but it just may resurrect his client.

SOURCE
 
Barkley on LeBron: ‘Just When You Think it Couldn’t Get Any Stupider’

<!-- By Author Name
-->Not too shockingly, Sir Charles — who never shies away from taking shots at ‘Bron ‘Bron — jumped all over him for his comments about race playing a role in the post-”Decision” backlash. SRI has the quotes from Barkley’s sports radio appearance: “On LeBron talking about race being an issue in the criticism he’s received: ‘It’s like watching a movie. Just when you think it couldn’t get any stupider, it gets more stupid.’

On LeBron continuing to make bad decisions: ‘Sometimes you just say he’s making bad decisions and you’re like okay, he’s gonna get it together. Then he makes more bad decisions. The thing that’s interesting about LeBron, I don’t think Magic, Michael, and myself, we said we wouldn’t have did it. That’s not a criticism. We were asked a question. I don’t want to play with Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, or Michael, I want to beat them. That’s strictly basketball. The only criticism I’ve heard about LeBron and it was my biggest criticism, that decision thing was just stupid. It was stupid. The second thing when they all came out there dancing around on stage, that was silly. That’s the only thing I’ve heard LeBron get criticized about. That has nothing to do with race. That’s what makes this last thing so stupid. That’s stupid. The only criticism of LeBron has been the decision and the one hour of our life that we can’t have back. And ESPN, oh my God. Oh my God. To go down to training camp and report everyday is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever seen. I’m watching yesterday and one of the guys actually said LeBron looked fierce in practice. I’m like fierce in practice? What the hell does that mean? He was fierce in the second day of training camp. You’re like come on man, he really didn’t say that did he. This summer with LeBron and all the stuff that went on is like a bad movie. You just can’t make this stuff up.’”
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/train...ry?columnist=adande_ja&page=LeBronRace-101001

ESPN - J.A. Adande

Trying to avoid writing about the Miami Heat this season will be as difficult as trying to avoid writing about race and the NBA. Here we are, mere days after the teams assembled for the first time, and already the two inescapable subjects have converged into a sports topic so consuming that we managed to go an entire 24-hour cycle without talking about the New York Jets.

Race is so incendiary that the fire quickly engulfed what should have been the real news emanating from Soledad O'Brien's CNN interview, namely the first mea culpa of any kind from LeBron James' camp regarding "The Decision."

"The execution could have been a little better," Maverick Carter said. "And I take some of the blame for that."

When I threw that quote on Twitter all it did was make some people even angrier because Carter couched his confession.

"Mav took 'some' blame? SOME?!" @dgoldstein79 tweeted to me. "He's now up for 2 awards: Worst PR decision of the century AND biggest understatement. Congrats!"

No one bothered to parse the racial comments in the same way. How many people noticed that Maverick used the same "s-word" -- some -- in addressing the racial component of the summer-long backlash against LeBron?

"It definitely played a role in some of the stuff coming out of the media, things that were written for sure," Carter said.

It's important to keep in mind that he and LeBron were merely responding to questions. What O'Brien was doing asking them in the first place is another matter. For all we know she could have been trying to gather some sound bites for her next "Black in America" special. She asked and LeBron answered, and according to the transcript, it went as follows:

O'BRIEN: "Do you think there's a role that race plays in this?"

JAMES: "I think so, at times. It's always, you know, a race factor."

That's all it took. He didn't claim to be a victim of racial persecution, he didn't call for a racial revolution. He simply responded to a question and noted that race is a factor at times.

It's a simple, fundamental truth in our society and, in particular, the NBA. As long as the NBA features predominantly black athletes playing for predominantly white owners who are selling their sport to predominantly white ticket buyers, there will be a race factor. It's an ongoing quandary, usually left unsaid.

Every once in a while the league will try to address it, never more awkwardly than the "Love It Live" ad campaign that utilized dead white singers as a means to sell tickets to see living black basketball players. Apparently the league felt Elvis Presley and Frank Sinatra made better spokespeople than Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O'Neal. And for the demographic that buys the bulk of season tickets and luxury suites, they very well could have been right.

That brings us to an essential component we must understand when it comes to any discussion of race and the NBA. It's OK for people to root for people who bear the most resemblance to themselves. I had no qualms with white Boston Celtics fans who bypassed racks of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce jerseys to buy a Brian Scalabrine jersey. If they could identify more with him -- to the extent almost anyone can identify with a 6-foot-9 man with OrangeSicle-colored hair -- that's fine. It's no different than black people who previously didn't care about the difference between a serve and a volley rushing to the TV to cheer for Venus and Serena Williams. We all do it to some degree, be it with athletes or even "Price Is Right" contestants. We tend to support those representing our racial group.

It's not racism. I prefer the term that movie producer (and soon to be Golden State Warriors owner) Peter Guber used repeatedly in his conversation with Charles Barkley in Barkley's 2005 book "Who's Afraid of a Large Black Man?": tribalism.

Tribalism is about familiarity within the known entity. It's not about hatred of others, it's about comfort within your own, with a natural reluctance to expend the energy and time to break across the barriers and understand another group.

Most of what we're quick to label racism isn't really racism. Racism is premeditated, an organized class distinction based on believed superiority and inferiority of different races. That "ism" suffix makes racism a system, just like capitalism or socialism. Racism is used to justify exclusion and persecution based on skin color, things that rarely come into play in today's NBA.

The league routinely gets A grades in Richard Lapchick's racial report cards for diversity in its racial and gender hiring. While that doesn't mean there's complete equality in front offices and coaching sidelines, there's no sense that a powerful invisible barrier bans African-Americans from those jobs like the sonic fence keeping out the smoke monster in "Lost."

The color of LeBron's skin won't prevent him from making $14.5 million to play basketball for the Miami Heat this season. It didn't prevent him from signing endorsement deals with corporate titans Coca-Cola, McDonald's and Microsoft while in his early 20s. It didn't keep people of all races from buying his jersey. Racism has yet to come into play in LeBron's professional life. That doesn't mean he can exist in a racial vacuum.

James managed to navigate the first seven years of his career without running into any racial reefs. You could say there was an African-American style to him, but he never presented any views as coming from a uniquely African-American perspective. All debates about LeBron were on his merits as a basketball player, as an individual, never linked to his ethnicity. There was a flare-up about the similarity of his Vogue magazine cover photo to a "King Kong" poster, but James didn't join the discussion.

Lately there's been a slow-moving racial weather front moving across the radar screen on the LeBron narrative, and ultimately he couldn't escape the story.

It began with Jesse Jackson's claim that Cleveland owner Dan Gilbert's late-night rant about LeBron's departure reflected a "slave master mentality" and that "He sees LeBron as a runaway slave." It was an overly exaggerated reaction to the reaction. If Gilbert really saw LeBron as a slave, he would have tracked him down with bloodhounds and lynched him. That's what slave masters did to escaped slaves. That's why I'll never equate professional or collegiate athletics to slavery.

Orlando Sentinel columnist Shannon Owens linked LeBron's appearance on a list of 10 most disliked athletes to his race. And on ESPN.com, Vincent Thomas said the growing resentment toward LeBron from white people would increasingly lead black people to embrace him, almost reflexively.

Now James has entered the fray himself, simply by acknowledging the presence of something we're never comfortable talking about. It came to his porch and he finally opened the door.

The counterargument is that James never felt compelled to address the league's racial element when everybody was an ally. No one wondered about the racial motivations of reporters and fans when they were writing praise and buying jerseys.

That's because race doesn't affect acceptance, it affects tolerance. When people behave in a manner accepted by society at large they are easy for everyone to embrace. It's who chooses to align with the outcasts that is telling.

LeBron quickly evaporated his reservoir of goodwill with the self-serving "Decision." His own actions were responsible for the ignition and the acceleration of the vitriol. Where race comes in is the continuation. The racial element won't be measured in the condemnation, which came from all corners. It will be measured in the willingness to forgive.

Self-indulgent? I always wondered why that tag didn't stick with white athletes such as Eli Manning, John Elway, Danny Ferry and Kiki Vandeweghe, who refused to play for the teams that drafted them until they could force a trade. Did they avoid permanent ostracizing for their blatant attempt to circumvent the rules that are essential for competitive balance in the league simply because they were white? They certainly don't pop up on the list when we talk about spoiled athletes.

LeBron, like the "draft dodgers," never was accused of a major crime against society. But this week LeBron made a transgression that fewer are willing to forgive. He just forced us to discuss the existence of something none of us feels comfortable doing. He caused us to examine the bias that's always lurking, that has the potential to spring from any of us.


JA Adande on ESPN. pretty interesting. I wish windy would write a great piece like this explaining the mentality of a cavalier/cleveland fans. maybe with a well thought out explanation to the rest of the country, the cavs, fans, dan gilbert would be looked at less like babies and more like passionate fans that feel thwarted.
 
Charles Barkley Rips Lebron James Over Race Comment

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/01/charles-barkley-lebron-james_n_747473.html


LeBron James says that race has played a role in the massive backlash he has received since joining the Miami Heat over the summer.

Charles Barkley disagrees. The former NBA star spoke with WIP in Philadelphia and called out LeBron for his comments on race.

Barkley repeatedly referred to the James saga as a bad movie and said the criticism he has heard have nothing to do with race.

"The only criticism I've heard about LeBron and it was my biggest criticism, that decision thing was just stupid. It was stupid," Barkley said. "The second thing when they all came out there dancing around on stage, that was silly. That's the only thing I've heard LeBron get criticized about. That has nothing to do with race."

"It's like watching a movie," the Basketball Hall of Famer added. "Just when you think it couldn't get any stupider, it gets more stupid."

The TNT analyst also ripped ESPN for reporting on the Heat training camp every day and catering to James. "They have definitely crossed the line and this is unprecedented," he said. "This is unprecedented ass kissing."
 
Maybe that's what I saw.

Maybe you should stop treating the douche bag like a saint, and stop supporting him no matter what he does.

"Oh, that pic is photoshopped, real LeBron will never do that" :chuckles:
 
Maybe you should stop treating the douche bag like a saint, and stop supporting him no matter what he does.

"Oh, that pic is photoshopped, real LeBron will never do that" :chuckles:

Lebron's defintely has done douchebag things off the court. I have no interest in him as a person.

I do like to watch him play basketball though.
 
Kobe can't salute cause his hand is weighed down with rings.

610x.jpg
 
To make a Lebron example out of it: He could be loyal as fuck to his friends. Employing them in his company. Giving them money when they need it. Refuse to call them out in the media. But what if his friends then turn around and create a situation where it's them or staying with the Cavs? If he picks the Cavs he's being disloyal to them. If he picks his friends he's being disloyal to the Cavs.

Like I said, real loyalty, loyalty that's tested and proved--is all about choosing who you are disloyal to. All acts of loyalty in the end are about favoring one person over another. There's a hierarchy there, which you can only reveal through test.
.

Here's the problem with your argument..

LeBron's friends(Rich Paul, Romeo, Chris Paul, etc) told him that they thought he should stay in Cleveland.
 
Here's the problem with your argument..

LeBron's friends(Rich Paul, Romeo, Chris Paul, etc) told him that they thought he should stay in Cleveland.

Yes. I follow Rich Paul on Twitter and he tweeted the day of "The Decision" that he begged and cried for Lebfuckface to stay in Cleveland but at that point there was no changing his mind. Out of all his friends, I'd say Maverick and most likely Worldwide Wes had the most influence in his decision.....along with him making the decision all on his own.
 
Here's the problem with your argument..

LeBron's friends(Rich Paul, Romeo, Chris Paul, etc) told him that they thought he should stay in Cleveland.

Ultimately most people are loyal to their own ideas, likes/dislikes etc.. before that of their friends. LeBron's loyalty like most peoples is likely weighted..i.e being loyal to family > being loyal to fans...being loyal to self > being loyal to D. Gilbert etc.... The mistaken idea that a LOYAL guy would have stayed in Cleveland and since James didnt he's not a loyal person is hilarious.
 
Ultimately most people are loyal to their own ideas, likes/dislikes etc.. before that of their friends. LeBron's loyalty like most peoples is likely weighted..i.e being loyal to family > being loyal to fans...being loyal to self > being loyal to D. Gilbert etc.... The mistaken idea that a LOYAL guy would have stayed in Cleveland and since James didnt he's not a loyal person is hilarious.

LeBron is an idiot. A guy who can't lead a team on his own. He's a lemming. So yes, LBJ was loyal to himself. And no, he was not loyal to family, his girl (whom he should make a wife) wanted him to stay in Ohio. So stop trying to be loyal his nuts.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top