OptimusPrime
Back in 2002
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 11,187
- Reaction score
- 10,715
- Points
- 123
Then we need to call them something else, because white nationalism seems pretty clear about what the motive is.
Also, I don't think it's a huge leap to suggest that the freedom of speech for those wishing to cause physical harm or exterminate non-whites should be restricted as opposed to peoplewho want social justice with a few people who have become violent.
There have always been limits to this "right."
Yes, the limit is where your speech violates the property rights of someone else, like yelling "fire" in a theater. No one has the right to be free from hearing the despicable things people say.
Any further "limits" only changes free speech from a right to a privilege, which I know is fine with most people anyway. They don't have a fucking clue what it means to have rights, so they go along with what the government tells them they can and can't do.