MediumBaller
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
- Messages
- 8,597
- Reaction score
- 12,406
- Points
- 123
Why?What a monumental blunder it would be to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Why?What a monumental blunder it would be to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Why?
No, but previous presidents from both parties made campaign promises to do this, and Congress passed a measure regarding this by a large margin, so it appears to have popular support from both sides.Well what he's done is say the US is not going to play fair in any future negotiation regarding a two state solution. How can you take Jerusalem from Palestinians? Makes no sense in theory or especially regarding diplomacy within the ME. It goes against all peace.
You disagree?
Why?
No, but previous presidents from both parties made campaign promises to do this, and Congress passed a measure regarding this by a large margin, so it appears to have popular support from both sides.
Angry?Welp, Trump did it....and it's arguably his worst policy decision since being elected IMO. Decades of work in the middle East burned to the ground.
But hey, at least Trump will have plenty of video footage of angry Muslims to tweet out.
There are just so. many. complicit Congressmen (and voters, alike). It's sad to see our democracy ripped apart at the seams and the powers that be are looking the other way.Jesus Christ....
I can't help but think this embassy move is meant to be a massive distraction. And what bothers me is that, this move will cost lives.. People are very likely going to die as this spirals out of control... Same thing could be said with the DPRK.
My concern is.. what would this President do.. how far would he go, just to control the news cycle and save his own administration?
Jesus Christ....
I can't help but think this embassy move is meant to be a massive distraction. And what bothers me is that, this move will cost lives.. People are very likely going to die as this spirals out of control... Same thing could be said with the DPRK.
My concern is.. what would this President do.. how far would he go, just to control the news cycle and save his own administration?
This is what I was talking about. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-jerusalem-decision-despite-past-support.htmlBoth sides of what?
Medium, no previous President ever came close to doing this. Congress passes meaningless resolutions all the time, knowing full well the resolutions are meaningless.
I think you might be misunderstanding what's going on and who the players are here. This has fuck all to do with Congress and their resolutions of support, that's a political game, it's theater..
This is what I was talking about. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-jerusalem-decision-despite-past-support.html
I guess I don't see the point in passing things like that if that's not how they really feel. I don't think the GOP has any intention of being fair in these peace talks. They have an infatuation with Israel that I don't really understand. This decision seems like a very bad idea from what I've read.
Jesus Christ....
I can't help but think this embassy move is meant to be a massive distraction. And what bothers me is that, this move will cost lives.. People are very likely going to die as this spirals out of control... Same thing could be said with the DPRK.
My concern is.. what would this President do.. how far would he go, just to control the news cycle and save his own administration?
What?Go you, man.