you be crazy if you think that curry is slower than molasses z. curry is lightning quick especially on offense or in the buffet line. yes he has a hard time on defense but with the ball he is the best center in the east. bar none. hands down.
curry for z would be a steal for us. there is no downside. any gm in the nba would make that trade in a heartbeat.
do a side by side comparision.
curry has a questionable work ethic, but z has a fully certain age issue. curry would stil be here averaging 20 & 5 when z has retired.
curry has limits on defense and as a rebounder, but z has even bigger limits on the offensive end. curry will give up some points to elite centers, but curry will make every center less effective because they will have to work so hard to defend him.
curry is a fan fav, while z has legions of detractors.
chicago did not give up on curry, they did not want to sign him to a large contract that could not be insured. no longer an issue.
curry was the offense leader of a chicago team that earned a first round playoff home court series. z has never done that.
curry is young and can improve while z is on the decline. we'll never have the room or the talent to get a legit star center. z is the last of a dyeing breed, unless the nyk will give us curry.
curry can run with Lebron and mates, while z is a slo-mo center that will catch up eventually.
z is better than even money on the pick and pop, but that clogs lanes to the basket for Lebron, while curry is a talented low post player who demands double teams, opening easy attempts for our sharpshooters.
Lebron makes z look slow and plodding; Lebron would make curry an allstar. with curry we could have four allstars on our team, because we already have hughes, varejao, and Lebron. niketown here we come.
