Ok, then let's just disagree on the level of the infraction. "Poorly worded" isn't harsh enough. Wreckless journalism or intentionally misleading for effect are how I see it. There are people reading this who know less about law than I do, and it gives them an incredibly misleading perspective into where we are at in this legal matter.
Then Q tip comes in here and doesn't answer the damn question. Bastard.
Oh, I entirely agree. I wasn't aware that was the point you wanted to make.
He's going to walk off with no problem. This was a non-story.