Let's be real, Gouri protects this guy like he's his own son. Yet I've seen him on more than one occasion go after LeBron for lazy ass play in the middle of a game. Which is a good thing. LeBron shouldn't be immune to criticism when he's loafing. But man, if you go at Kyrie, he's all over your shit
Not sure why I'm coming up here, but okay...
Yes, I defend Kyrie Irving because he's a Cavalier, we drafted him, and I've watched him come up... I sat in the Philippines and Japan for a year watching nothing but the NBA, quite a few teams , and almost every game.. It was the only English programming I had available to me..
And in that time, the most exciting player to watch for much of that time was Kyrie Irving.
I'd venture to guess that Kyrie will be MVP of the league someday, just as Steph and likely Harden will be this year.
But getting to my Kyrie support, well, part of the defense is because I think people genuinely misunderstand the stats they use to discuss Irving. As a mathematician, that bothers the hell out of me... Not because people are trying to use math to make an argument -- I think that's great.. But because people are not willing to check their work when flaws are pointed out, or are engaging in confirmation bias like
@Jscc said, or recency bias as these past few pages demonstrate...
I'll go through numbers, analytics, play-by-plays... and somehow that's a problem?
I'm not shitting on people personally, attacking anyone.. I'm not trolling... I'm saying, if you've got an argument, let's have at it.
Now do I defend the indefensible? No. Kyrie wasn't any good today.. But, let's be real, there's posters here who are chomping at the bit to run in this thread and take a shit all over it.
Those are the folks I'll be calling out in when Kyrie regresses towards the mean, which I think is closer to his last month's performance than it was to tonight's game...
Criticism is fine, yeah, but bemoaning and whining individual players for no reason? That amounts to nothing... It's not rational, it's not productive; it's not analytical, and it's not useful.. What is to be had of reading someone come on a Cavaliers message board in the Kyrie Irving thread to whine about Kyrie Irving being overrated in various passive aggressive ways?
What the fuck is that?
IF we're going to have a rational conversation, then let's have at it.... Otherwise, I think the overriding narrative of the thread should stand which is REAL CAVS FANS - KYRIE IRVING.
p.s.
I haven't criticized LeBron in
months, probably even a year. I really cannot remember the last time it's been.... I've made remarks suggesting LeBron might have caused us to lose a game if another player is being blamed for it, but I'm not openly criticizing him, I'm pointing out where the causative factor lies.