Scholar
Sports Archaeologist
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,934
- Reaction score
- 4,883
- Points
- 113
Do not take my words out of context or re-arrange them to benefit your post. I never said "He's going to be a 30/15 guy". I said he has the talent to be. He does.
I never said he was better than LeBron, nor did I say he would be. I said "but if he became fully invested & reached his full potential, he is worth more than any other player in the NBA with the possible exception of LeBron" For clarity, since your reading comprehension is poor, I will make it clear for you. If Cousins reaches his potential, he'd be worth more than any other player currently in the NBA, with the possible exception of LeBron. I give LeBron latitude due to his post acumen both offensively & defensively at the 4 position. A great Center is almost always worth more than any other position-player on the court. LeBron may be an exception, Jordan, and Kobe (in their primes) too. But the rule still applies.
Finally, I never said he was the next Shaq. I said Shaq was a good comparison for Cousins, in the context of what I was talking about, ie: Talent. Cousins has the same offensive capability (perhaps slightly less) in the post, with the size & strength to knock every other center currently in the NBA on their ass. Cousin's defense is also comparable to Shaq's. Whereas Shaq had team-mates who could play the game at a high level and allow him to excel, and top-notch coaching. Shaq is an excellent comparison to Cousins. He [Cousins] is not the "next" Shaq. He is the first DMC!
Next time you want to critique a person's opinion, try doing it without taking liberties when quoting what they said.
Name the last time a player actually put up 30/15 for a season. Go ahead and do it. That is an absolutely nonsensical suggestion that he could put up those numbers. Prove your work.
"Worth more then any other player with the possible exception of Lebron." You do know what the word "possible" means don't you? It means maybe. So, in your mind, it is certainly possible that he'll be better then everyone. If that isn't the case, why the hell didn't you just say that he will NOT be better then Lebron?
Look at what you just wrote about comparing him to Shaq. I was interpreting you correctly. You think he can be just as good as Shaq with absolutely no track record to support that. Following that line of reason, there is nothing wrong with me inferring that you think he is the next Shaq. You are certainly claiming he could have that kind of impact. Hell, claiming that you expect he'd put up 30/15 if he reaches full potential means that he'd be better then Shaq since Mr O.Neal never managed to put up those combined numbers in a single season.
I really don't care how you want to spin this crap. Really, Heath, I don't. But, it is so over the top to be completely laughable. I still can't get this absurd 30/15 number. Kareem, Wilt, they put up those kind of numbers. But, it is also over 40 years since either of those players accomplished that. Dude hasn't even put up a single 20/10 season. Now, a 20/10 season I certainly think is possible. But, 30/15 is HoF type numbers for players from a by gone era. How about seeing this player actually give a crap about the game first before suggesting such a lofty production level?