- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 10,307
- Reaction score
- 23,672
- Points
- 135
Again, as I've stated in previous posts, I'm not huge on the Mike Brown hire because I don't believe his style is conducive to winning championships. It's way to fixed in its approach and inflexible to change. However, that type of structure is exactly what this young team needs. It needs a defensive system installed and someone who is willing to teach every basic principal from the top down. It isn't enough to have an assistant coach working late hours on individual development. This team needs a guy who holds everyone acountable to the same standards he holds himself too. The old "lead by example" motto fits here.
One thing that Mike Brown requires as a coach is player buy-in. He knows the problems that come when everyone on the team doesn't have a blind trust in their team mates. He wants the players to trust each other and he wants the players to trust him.
One of the main ways that he gets there is by listening to the players' feed back in the film sessions. If a player thinks that he's got a better idea than he does, Coach will agree to try the player's ideas for a several games, and then hit the player with film showing why he'd rather do things differently if it doesn't work out. He's not inflexible to the people he works with, but it is one of the reason's why Mike Brown teams come out of the gate slowly.
One of the reasons Coach Brown seems inflexible to fans is because he doesn't want to be a "master of panic". He knows that most players need to feel a certain amount of trust from the coach. He prefers to change strategies slowly so that players have time to understand why changes are going on, and they don't feel like they are getting yanked because of a few unlucky bounces. Much like a good black jack strategy, it might not win every hand, but it pays off over time.
Often Mike Browns plans get pretty elaborate. That can work if he's got a vet team that knows what he wants, but isn't conducive to teaching the young guys. Back in 2005, he had to simplify a lot. Much of the stuff that looked good on paper when he showed up had to get tossed to fit the personnel and the experience. For example that "Z hard show" on the pick and roll that was a signature of past Mike Brown defenses showed up in his first year, but had to get scraped before the end of January 2006 because the team wasn't ready for it. It came back with tuning and training and worked well by the end of 2007. I'm fairly confident that he can tailor his approach to his players, using November and December as a test lab to incorporate player feed back, identify mistakes on the big stage that don't show up in practice, scale back on stuff that the players aren't ready for yet, and come up with something that's at least an average NBA defense by the all star break of next year.
Hard working guys like Zeller and Tristan should do very well on defense under Brown. He will scale back on the complexity if he's giving them stuff that's too hard for them, and spend as much time as they can handle drilling them on the stuff that they can do. I think Zeller will go from a total defensive liability to a smart positional defender before the end of next season. He might not look like a defensive natural, but I think we'll see good plus/minus numbers from him sooner than many expect.
I've got no idea how things will work out of offense, but he's got a lot of the stuff he likes. He's got a instinctual pick and roll big man in Varejao. He's got guards that can turn the corner to dent a zone. He's got enough passing to get those hockey assists when a defense reacts. He's got enough shooting to beat teams that pack the paint. He's got a transcendent scorer in Kyrie that can win close games when the team grinds out a win. He's got the ammo that he needs to make stuff work. He's also got the advantage that it's practically impossible for him to look any worse than what we saw this year.
I'm more optimistic about the coaching situation than I was two months ago when I thought we'd see Scott back for another year of physically punishing workouts, confusion on the court, and laissez-faire game planning.