Playoff Positioning

[David.]

I read the post. You said Hawks were playing the Pacers, and then used that to justify your analysis. I think you're trying to make it more complicated then it actually is.

So the three seed in the west is playing the 6th best team then?

Smh

 

[TitleTown]

So the three seed in the west is playing the 6th best team then?

Smh

Your point was about the 1 seed--that's all I've ever been responding to.

 

[David.]

Your point was about the 1 seed--that's all I've ever been responding to.

Your point implies the better the seed the easier the path and it's Fucking stupid and simple.

Only thing you can do now is expound upon that initial point or add qualifiers, which turns your initial point into dogshit

 

[TitleTown]

Your point implies the better the seed the easier the path and it's Fucking stupid and simple.

You were acting all astonished that the Warriors path to the playoffs was easier, when that's precisely how the playoff seeding should work. And then you said that the Hawks are playing the Pacers (when they are actually playing the Nets).

Who is stupid?

 

[David.]

You were acting all astonished that the Warriors path to the playoffs was easier, when that's precisely how the playoff seeding should work. And then you said that the Hawks are playing the Pacers (when they are actually playing the Nets).

Who is stupid?

Why don't you answer the question directly?


the higher seed has the easiest path, why is the three seed fucked?

ps the pacers were the 8 seed at the time I posted dummy.which would have been even more proof that your argument is simple and stupid

 

[TitleTown]

Your point was about the Warriors having the easiest path originally, was it not? That is the only thing I'm talking about. Don't change the conversation to make it seem less dumb.