• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Sterling surrenders control of Clippers to Shelly (pg 35)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist

Donald Sterling Surrenders Control of Clippers... to Shelly
5/23/2014 6:49 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
EXCLUSIVE


Donald Sterling is no longer the controlling owner of the Los Angeles Clippers ... TMZ Sports has learned he just surrendered control to his estranged wife, Shelly Sterling, and she is now secretly negotiating with the NBA to sell the team ... ON HER TERMS.

Sources close to the Clippers organization tell us ... Donald made the decision because he saw the handwriting on the wall -- as long as he remained in control, the NBA would order an involuntary sale of the team.

Our sources say Shelly and her lawyer, Pierce O'Donnell, have been secretly meeting with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver and NBA lawyers to "resolve the dispute amicably." We're told Shelly realizes the NBA wants the team sold, but she has significantly more leverage and credibility with the league than Donald. Her end game is simple -- she won't object to the sale, but SHE wants to call the shots.

Our Sterling sources say Shelly is prepared to sue the NBA and she will file legal docs on Tuesday if the NBA orders an INVOLUNTARY sale. She's down with a sale but only a voluntary one that puts her in control.

Attorney Pierce O'Donnell would not comment on this story, but did say, "Shelly Sterling's preference has always been to find a way to resolve this dispute amicably with the NBA in a mutually satisfactory manner."


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/05/23/donal...-clippers-sale-adam-silver-nba/#ixzz32YPbitEC
 
Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist

Cuban just seems dead set on going down with the ship on this one, and I really have no idea why. First he commented about not taking Sterling's team away from him (which, for the record, was a perfectly reasonable opinion, just a dumb one to say out loud), and now this.

Dude just needs to shut up until this Sterling shitstorm blows over.

Not sure exactly why Cuban should shut up, because he raises a valid point. Shit, his comments were less offensive than the ones Jesse Jackson made about young black men. Sterling's comments were so clearly over the top that he had to go. But, it raises the question of exactly where the line should be drawn, which is something that the league might want to think about before they have to address the next offensive statement.
 
Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist

Not sure exactly why Cuban should shut up, because he raises a valid point. Shit, his comments were much offensive than the ones Jesse Jackson made about young black men. Sterling's comments were so clearly over the top that he had to go. But, it raises the question of exactly where the line should be drawn, which is something that the league might want to think about before they have to address the next offensive statement.

I don't have a problem with Cuban expressing his opinions, or a problem with his opinions. He has a right to express those opinions, and he brings up some valid points.

That said, all he's really going to do here is potentially piss off players, and that in turn might cause them to choose somewhere other than Dallas to play. It's just a bad business move to get involved with this imo.
 
Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist

I don't have a problem with Cuban expressing his opinions, or a problem with his opinions. He has a right to express those opinions, and he brings up some valid points.

That said, all he's really going to do here is potentially piss off players, and that in turn might cause them to choose somewhere other than Dallas to play. It's just a bad business move to get involved with this imo.

Yeah, it may not be good for Dallas in particular. On the other hand, as a partner in the league, he may see the need to address the topic head-on to avoid more problems in the future.
 
Cuban made valid points but did he expect the NBA to put Sterling in racist rehab? And the black guy in a hoodie comment was stupid on his part no matter how right it was.
 
Excellent article on the topic by Kareem in TIME magazine.

Polls show that more whites believe in ghosts than believe racism is a problem in America. I guess that’s why Ghost Hunters is so popular but my show, Racist Wranglers, never got picked up. Maybe the reason is how we define racism.

Paula Deen, Cliven Bundy, Don Imus. Not racists.

To their family, closest friends and adoring pets, they’re just plain-speaking Americans who have probably said the phrase, “I don’t care if you’re white, black, yellow or purple.” (FYI: You might be a racist if you’ve used that phrase.)

That’s why their faces have that shocked “Who me?” expression at the public outrage over their statements.

All of them could probably name several people of color among their friends, close acquaintances and business associates. All could probably cite minority folk they’ve personally helped through their generosity. Sterling was about to receive a second NAACP award (since canceled) for his work with minority children. He had a mixed-race girlfriend. What more proof can the public want of his “I don’t see color” purity!

What’s that? You say you need further proof that he can’t be a racist?

Commentator Bill O’Reilly informed us that discrimination is “all in the past.” Fox News’ Eric Bolling seconded that by saying, “Is there racism? I don’t believe there’s racism.” A Republican National Committee tweet on the 58th anniversary of Rosa Parks’ arrest confirmed the body of racism had been buried: “Today we remember Rosa Parks’ bold stand and her role in ending racism.” Bam! Done! Mic drop!

Still not convinced?

How about the U.S. Supreme Court, you skeptical naysayers. The Justices (all wearing black gospel robes in support of racial equality) confirm Sterling and Pals’ assertion that they are not racists by proclaiming, “Racism is dead!” Well, if not dead, at least suffering from debilitating acid reflux. Several of their recent decisions, invalidating key parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and striking down affirmative action, were based on the court’s assessment that “We’ve come a long way, baby” since the civil rights movement of the 1960s. I’m surprised they didn’t close their decision with a wink and a “Can you dig it?”

Well, go tell it on the mountain, Justices, because down here in the flatlands of daily living, racism isn’t just alive, but it’s cloning faster than Sean Hannity can backpedal his support of Cliven Bundy.

Racism today isn’t like the racism pre–Martin Luther King Jr. Today we are faced with “situational racism.” This is similar to situational ethics, a philosophical and theological movement that argues that rather than having fixed, one-size-fits-all ethical rules of behavior, the context of each situation must be considered before determining the correct moral choice. Situational racism applies this flexible principle by declaring we must act according to a realistic analysis of race as it is in our society right now, not as we wish it were.

The clichéd example: You’re walking down a dark, deserted street and a bunch of black teens adorned with dagger tattoos and carrying bongs made from human skulls are walking toward you. If you cross the street, are you being a racist or a realist?

That’s what Sterling meant when he said on the tape, “It’s the world! … We don’t evaluate what’s right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture … I don’t want to change the culture because I can’t. It’s too big …” He didn’t see his attitude as racist, just a practical reaction to a racist world.

Basically, he’s saying, “It’s not me. It’s Society! It’s the Man! I’m just a helpless pawn, a clump of toilet paper caught in the swirling toilet bowl of history.” The housing discrimination he was convicted of wasn’t racism, it was just practical business sense. After all, he’s in business to make money, not history.

Maybe the worst racism of all is denying that racism exists, because that keeps us from repairing the damage. This country needs a social colonoscopy to look for the hidden racist polyps. And we aren’t doing ourselves any good by saying, “I feel fine. Everything’s fine. Nothing to see here.”

The truth is, everyone has racism in his or her heart. We feel more comfortable around people of similar appearance, backgrounds and experiences. But, as intelligent, educated and civilized humans, we fight our knee-jerk reactions because we recognize that those reactions are often wrong and ultimately harmful.

One symptom of the malady is the many apologists using the election of President Obama as proof that racism doesn’t exist in the U.S. Yes, his position truly is a sign of the distance we’ve all covered in the last few decades. But, as recent events have proved, this race is a marathon and President Obama is merely a milestone, not the finish line.

The finish line is when racism no longer exists, not when people claim it doesn’t exist because they personally don’t notice it. Why is it that the people who are declaring racism dead are mostly white? Because if you’re not a targeted group, you don’t notice it. A 2006 CNN poll showed 49% of blacks saying racism is a “very serious” problem, while only 18% of whites agreed. A 2012 Associated Press poll showed that 51% of Americans expressed anti-black attitudes, up from 48% in a 2008 survey. Also, 52% displayed anti-Hispanic biases.

Every time the media call attention to racism, it raises the awareness of those who otherwise might not have noticed it around them. It’s a variation of the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon, in which someone learns a new bit of information and suddenly sees the information being used in multiple places in a short period of time. The reason for this is that the brain is constantly inundated with so much information that it rejects what it considers uninteresting (“uninteresting” being things that don’t affect you personally). This process is known as “selective attention.”

That’s why the best way to combat racism in the face of selective attention and situational racism is to seek it out every minute of every day and expose every instance we find. And not just racism, but also sexism, homophobia and every other kind of injustice that lessens the principles of inclusion that define this country.

We can’t let others control the perception or the message. We’ve got to go tell it on the mountain ourselves.
 
Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist

So it looks like Cuban is now getting some major flack for the following:


I personally don't have a problem with what Cuban said, which I think is much different from what Sterling said. But I heard Cris Carter go off on him, and according to this article, so have some others as well.

I heard the interview in NBA radio today. The quotes aren't accurate, they left stuff out that changed the context of what he said. There was more to both statements, I don't remember all of the specifics, but there was "at night" when referring to a guy wearing a hoodie , and he specifically said bald head and "face covered with tattoos" in the other example. Not too many people are just going to keep going the way they are headed if they see this guy in front of them

skinhead.jpg


or this

stock-photo-gang-members-in-a-dark-alley-35596627.jpg


He perhaps could have picked his words a little better, but why did they take words out of his statements to make them more general, and remove the rest of the context of what he was saying to turn it into a controversy.
 
Cuban is one of my favorite people of all time, but he really just humanized racism and brought rationale to it, in a way that everyone could relate to being racist. Im on his side, but he really is just (to a lesser degree) representing Sterlingesque opinions but presented in a PR focused light.

I especially commend his complete lack of defense to the non-reference of Trayvon Martin and says 'oh fuck it, fine.. "im sorry I said that about Trayvon".'
 
Cuban is one of my favorite people of all time, but he really just humanized racism and brought rationale to it, in a way that everyone could relate to being racist. Im on his side, but he really is just (to a lesser degree) representing Sterlingesque opinions but presented in a PR focused light.

I especially commend his complete lack of defense to the non-reference of Trayvon Martin and says 'oh fuck it, fine.. "im sorry I said that about Trayvon".'

Do you really think it's racist to avoid people who look like a skinhead or a gang member when traveling on a dark street because there's a chance they aren't? The whole "at night" part got edited out of his comments in every single report that supposedly quoted him.
 
no, I dont, but he also knows that if he throws it in there his statements are (supposed to be) no longer considered racist.

Its a smoother version of the old 'I have black friends!' defense of his argument
 
no, I dont, but he also knows that if he throws it in there his statements are (supposed to be) no longer considered racist.

Its a smoother version of the old 'I have black friends!' defense of his argument

what are you talking about defense? He said flat out that we all have biases and used those as examples. Did you listen to the interview or only read the oddly edited excerpts? He also talked about when he comes across racist people in his businesses, he tries to take steps to give them a chance to become better people instead of simply firing them. You have to listen to the actual interview for the details.
 
Apparently the Sterlings are getting offers up to 2.5 billion for the Clippers:

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nba/2372/donald-sterling

Donald Sterling's lawyer told NBC News that Sterling "has received offers in excess of $2.5 billion" for the Clippers.
Recent reports pegged the franchise's value around $2 billion, a number which could increase if a bidding war develops. That seems likely since there are already numerous groups rumored to be preparing offers, including groups led by Oprah Winfrey, Yao Ming, Magic Johnson and Grant Hill. The league's efforts to force the Clippers' sale appears to be working, as the Sterlings seem resigned to losing their franchise in exchange for a few billion dollars. May 27 - 6:49 PM
 
Apparently billions of dollars is not going to motivate Sterling to sell:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Sterling's lawyer Max Blecher tells ESPN that &quot;He's not interested in selling. He's going to fight to the bloody end&quot;</p>&mdash; Ramona Shelburne (@ramonashelburne) <a href="https://twitter.com/ramonashelburne/statuses/471485075193098240">May 28, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Sterling aside , What Cuban was describing is more profiling than racism.

People of all races do it. its not a black problem, hispanic problem or white problam its a human problem.

then again there also awareness.

If I am making smalltalk with a black guy I dont know. I am hesitate to bring up sports.

Racism awareness also leads to further racism.

At the same time some behaviour between mixed races could be construed as racism or profiling some of those same things amongst people of the same race could be called etiquette.

Racism and bigotry are big powerful words. but like any word misused and abused they start to loser their power. people become indifferent. and you can get to the equivalent of the boy who cried wolf as in people start to tune it out after awhile.

I find it interesting. Sterlings Blatant racism in his discrimination suits was largely overlooks meanwhile the rhetoric and his own personal preference over the phone struck a chord.

but even there Sterling was determining who his assistant could and couldnt invite to his games based solely on race.

regardless.. no big deal on the corporate level.. on the ersonal level though people found it reprehensinble.. Im speaking in general terms /.. im sure there a few people screaming to the NBA about Sterlings antics but it wasnt mainstream.
 
Ladies and Gentleman: the reigning NBA champion Miami Heat.

heat-martin2x-large.jpg


These men, and their colleagues on other teams, have power because they are the talent in an entertainment business; without the talent there is no business. At its heart, it is simply a matter of self respect; they simply aren't having it.

The NBA leadership has determined that the exercise of this power will be distasteful to the public, and therefore brings the potential for significant negative impact to league revenue.

As has been noted, corporate sponsors have the power to affect league revenue in this situation as well, which they will yield for a entirely different set of reasons.

These scenario must be avoided at all costs by a league in ever-increasing competition for the marginal entertainment dollar.

It has nothing to do with free speech or privacy. It is about a franchise holder who let his sordid lifestyle expose his personal bullshit to the public in a manner which proved unacceptable to to the above stakeholders, and thereby put league revenues at risk. Nothing more, nothing less.

Donald Sterling has to go, and has to go quickly.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top