I disagree that the number one is better than two top 6 picks. The number one pick rarely ever turns out to be the player that they were drafted to be.
For example in the last 9 drafts (since 2000) the number one pick has been worse than or equal to another top 10 pick. In 2001 (Brown 1st overall, Pau 3rd, JRich 5th, Johnson 10th), 2002 (Ming 1st overall, Amare 9th overall), 2005 (Bogut 1st overall, Willaims 3rd, Paul 4th), 2006 (Bargs 1st overall, Aldridge 2nd, Brandon Roy 6th, Rudy Gay 8th), 2007 (Oden 1st overall, Durant 2nd, Horford 3rd, Green 5th, Noah 9th), 2009 (Griffen 1st overall, Evans 4th, Curry 7th, Jennings 10th).
Brown, Oden are huge busts. In the last nine drafts there have been three busts (Brown, Oden, Griffen) and two injury proned big men (Bogut, Ming) that are not as good as players taken after them.
Most are most likely not ready to call Griffen a bust yet, but I am. Looking at the msot recent big man that missed his first year due to injury (Oden) I think Griffen will have a similar career. Getting the number one pick is no guarantee of getting the best player in the draft is what I am getting at. If you can get two top 6 picks to help build your team around then I think it would be worth the risk if you are in the same position as Washington. Sure Wall has a ton of hype surrounding him, but for every player that reaches the level that he was hyped up to be there are ten that don't. I mean just look at our very own Bassy, he was labelled as as good of a player as LeBron, now he has to accept a 2.7 million player option because he is not worth that much.
Basically to me I see the 5th pick having just as good of a chance of becoming a franchise conrner stone as the first pick. Even if the 5th and 6th pick were to be maxed out as 15/10 bigs than that would be better than any numbers Wall would put up.
Of course this is all very unlikely, we most likely will not get either pick let alone both, but it is fun to talk about
.