The Oi
Ahhhh chachachacha
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 50,896
- Reaction score
- 77,137
- Points
- 148
Would much rather have Okafor...he is an all around better player imo.
Yeah, but he's not white so...
Would much rather have Okafor...he is an all around better player imo.
I've said it before and I will say it again.
How do you replace an ugly 7 foot white guy? Get an uglier 7 foot white guy.
Chris Kaman is not that athletic and the foot injury does not help him either. He is a decent defender but not a great one.
You're a racist if you think that Kaman is not athletic for a 7 footer :thumbdown
no clue what this music is or what the hell it says at the beginning...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfzS...658E558CD&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=7
Would much rather have Okafor...he is an all around better player imo.
The frustration you have with Z's defense, would be about the same with Okafors offensive.
However Okafor shoots above 53% from the field and averages a double double...Plus his defensive capabilities surpass anything Z could do.
-In closing I would take either Kaman or Okafor happily because they both improve our team greatly.
I also really like Kaman. He's a guy that can score on his own, and he is definitely a physical presence.
I'm pretty sure he's a guy that does not even take mid-range shots. Can somebody help me out, am I right?
Corrected. :gap: