czvo
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 18,182
- Reaction score
- 22,964
- Points
- 135
The Harden deal takes too much heat. They would have had to move someone at some point and probably the next year (last year). When you look at the 3 potential candidates to get traded, I'd say they chose right in trading Harden instead of Westbrook or Ibaka. Did they trade him a year before they had too? Yea, but then again what difference did it make? Westbrook gets hurt at the start of the playoffs. Even with Harden that team isn't a contender w/o Westbrook.
Zach Lowe actually just had an article explaining how they actually could have kept all three, even if they gave Harden the max. Of course, it was contingent on the salary cap skyrocketing, which they really couldn't have predicted. Still, there is a strong argument to be made in favor of not trading a really good player before you absolutely have to.
Anyway, I don't think Westbrook or Durant should be "blamed" for losing this series. They both played their asses off. The Spurs were just better. The difference between this year and 2012 is Reggie Jackson isn't James Harden.
Moving forward, the Thunder are fine. Adams will take Perk's place in the starting lineup and Lamb should be able to take over for Thabo. Reggie Jackson continues to improve, and you have to think he will only get better. They have the 21st pick, so they will be able to add a young guy that could contribute right away. Most importantly, their big three will be fully healthy this offseason. Should they remain in good health next year, they will be a top-3 seed again. Significant changes are not necessary.