• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Kidd Wants To Be A Cav Next Season

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
What I like about Kidd is that he's a guy who can find anyone on the court, he's got amazing passing ability. He knows how to take advantage of Shaq or LeBron either drawing the double team or being open and can set them up perfectly. He'd rack up those assists if he were to come here. As a backup, he could be amazing...
 
kid for the BAE. CV/sheed for the MLE, joe smith resigned, and this team is locked and loaded.
 
kid for the BAE. CV/sheed for the MLE, joe smith resigned, and this team is locked and loaded.

Agreed but I think we need 1 more wing player - Hill/Barnes quality for depth and to adjust to ORL

Also I would re-sign AV too, since he can play Center & PF we can use him to backup Z/Shaq, who are both old/injury prone.
 
I would rather have Dice with the BAE. Then Sheed/CV with the MLE.

Trade for the taller wing and I like our lineup against ANYBODY. I'm not only concerned with the Magic. I'm thinking about our potential matchup with the Lakers as well.

I think Dice is better than Joe smith. I think he has a more consistent 17 footer and is more tougher.
 
^Dice will command more than the BAE IMO. I could see SA/BOS/ORL all making a run for him, possibly a team like HOU or DAL also.
 
If Kidd came here i'd rather have him start and bring a scorer like Mo off the bench.....not sure how that would fly though but Mo could be a Jason Terry type and just come in with the @nd unit and pour in the pts.....man we'd be a deep - deep team
 
MO is a starter dude. Kidd at the point Mo at the 2. Kidd guards the 2 on defense. Lets not forget Kidd is still a pretty damn good defender on the ball.
 
yea rockin his Cal Bears #
 
Surely the Cavs will attract some attention to a high level player, somewhere.

Could Jason Kidd be that? I know that at his age, he will strongly consider it. And the fact that Shaq now teams with (one of) the best player(s) in the NBA will only attract that much more attention.

Charlie is also considering it, but if he's restricted, he may be needed for a trade...

For Jason, though... he will decide $$$ VS the Championship. If Championship, we're the front runners at this point. If $$$, he's staying in Dallas. We'll have our answer either July 1st or July 8th. Methinks decisions will come quickly to the league's players if they want to team with LBJ and Shaq.
 
Just wanted to remind some people of Wine and Gold's comments about if Kidd did come here- he thought that they would start both Mo and Kidd to further push Lebron off of the ball and had faith that Kidd would guard the opposing teams SG.

I don't know if I like that on defense, but it's at least an interesting idea. (Also note that it was before we acquired Shaq, so his thoughts might have changed.)
 
Here is an article from a Dallas paper after the draft.

link

DALLAS — Gamblers are accustomed to the position the Dallas Mavericks were in Thursday night.

In the past two years, the Mavericks acted like they were on the final table at the World Series of Poker. They went all in.

They lost.

The 2009 NBA Draft was their first attempt to rebuild their assets. It should be noted that anyone who believes Rodrigue Beaubois from Cholet in France is the final card of a winning hand at the final table likely believes that a poker championship is winnable with a pair of twos.

When the Mavericks traded for Jason Kidd 16 months ago, their stated goal was to win a championship. They didn’t. The gamble failed. Now they have to move on.

One direction they should avoid is re-signing Kidd, who will be a free agent. If people close to Kidd are to be believed, he doesn’t want to come back to Dallas, either.

Kidd wants to win a championship and at age 36, he’s no longer a franchise player. He’s still very good and he did a nice job for the Mavericks last season. But he’s not the key player to winning a title, and you can be sure he knows that.

So it only makes sense for him to go to a team that, perhaps, has a franchise player and dominant center. LeBron, Shaq and JKidd?

If Kidd is not back, the obvious question is what can the Mavericks do to continue to be competitive at a playoff level in the Western Conference?

They’ve done little so far, which is irritating to some people with short attention spans. Mavericks general manager Donnie Nelson pointed out, however, that in recent years, Dallas has made trades on draft day (Devin Harris), but also made a trade the day before training camp opened (Antoine Walker).

There is plenty of time, yet it’s difficult for fans to be patient when they watch San Antonio improve exponentially by adding Richard Jefferson, a career 18-point-a-game scorer, and giving up only two players who are 37 and another who is 34.

That’s a fleecing. And if Manu Ginobili returns healthy, the Spurs have four players with major offensive abilities and a coach who demands defense.

From a Mavericks’ perspective, that’s not good.

Nelson said, however, that fans should not be depressed by their team’s inactivity thus far.

"We’re fully aware of what’s going on out there," Nelson said, "but this is our ship and we’ve got to run it the way we think best. We don’t feel a sense of urgency to do something based on what someone else does."

Well, perhaps they should. Otherwise, they could find themselves in a position immortalized by former Knick Micheal Ray Richardson, who once noted about his team: "The ship be sinking."

Again, training camp is more than three months away so until the free-agent signing period begins on July 8, the Mavericks deserve a little slack, especially because Nelson said: "It’s going to be a very active summer for us."

The Mavericks can get better with creative trades and salary cap maneuvering that would allow them to sign a free agent or two. But you have to wonder if the best plan isn’t simply to mark time until the free agent class of next summer.

It is unlikely the Mavericks can sign LeBron James or Dwyane Wade, but players such as Chris Bosh and Joe Johnson would be possibilities. Team a premium free agent or two with Dirk Nowitzki and the Mavericks could compete with the elite teams in the league.

There is little doubt the Mavericks have dropped a little from the glory days of the 2006 Finals. Still, the Kidd trade was a good gamble. The Mavericks went all in. They simply did not have enough to challenge for a title and certainly were hampered by Josh Howard missing 30 games and Jerry Stackhouse missing 72 with injuries.

Those who continue to fixate on the loss of Devin Harris should check the standings. The Nets were 14 games worse than .500 last season and after trading Vince Carter to Orlando on Thursday, they will be worse next season. Harris is excellent, but he’s not a franchise player.

If anyone wants to focus on the loss of a point guard, then talk about Steve Nash. Losing him for nothing was far more damaging to championship chances than losing Harris.

The argument could be made, however, that the losses of Nash and Harris should give Mavericks fans hope. After Nash left, the Mavericks made the Finals. That demonstrates good management.

And in trading Harris, the Mavericks weren’t afraid to make a bold move. To become relevant at a championship level again, the Mavericks at some point — perhaps soon — again will have to go all in.

It’s a good bet they will have no problem doing that.
 
Just wanted to remind some people of Wine and Gold's comments about if Kidd did come here- he thought that they would start both Mo and Kidd to further push Lebron off of the ball and had faith that Kidd would guard the opposing teams SG.

I don't know if I like that on defense, but it's at least an interesting idea. (Also note that it was before we acquired Shaq, so his thoughts might have changed.)

I still agree about that. I feel getting Shaq and Kidd this season could be detrimental to LeBrons development. First off we could finally have a player LeBron respects enough to push him off of the ball. Shaq is a player that can push LeBron in a similar sense because of the respect that LeBron has for him. Shaq will force LeBron to work on his jumper, and it will also help him give up the ball more.
 
Just wanted to remind some people of Wine and Gold's comments about if Kidd did come here- he thought that they would start both Mo and Kidd to further push Lebron off of the ball and had faith that Kidd would guard the opposing teams SG.

I don't know if I like that on defense, but it's at least an interesting idea. (Also note that it was before we acquired Shaq, so his thoughts might have changed.)

With Shaq/Lebron I would prefer to build a team that has shooters at the 1/2/4, or at least offensive threats at each of those positions. I could see teams cheating off Kidd to double all game long - I know he has improved as a shooter but he is still erratic.

Kidd off the bench could work though..if he really wants to be here as a ring chaser on the cheap
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top