gourimoko
Fighting the good fight!
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,845
- Reaction score
- 53,645
- Points
- 148
So, neither scenario likely happens. Both less that 5%.
But, I have to admit, you're in that magic zone right now. Drunk enough that you have an irrational view of yourself, but not so drunk that you've lost your mojo.
All of the facts are reasonable for Wade or Durant. It filters down the line of reasonable assumptions. But in the end... you say... "Holy shit, it might happen" when the compounded odds are just so low.
I'm liking this discussion, however, because I'm high on Championship Cheeba myself.
Yeah, neither of these possibilities are likely -- at all... by any stretch of the imagination.
However, with Wade, we saw what happened last year between Wade and Riley, and we saw how his dad and Gabrielle were pimping the Cavs option hard. We saw him at the Finals games this year, and pimping the Cavs on national television last year.
Now, this year, I guess the assumption is that Riley will just hand Wade $15M a year over 3 years with a smile on his face? I dunno why that's the consensus opinion, but, there's no reason to believe this is true. Riley is a notorious back-stabbing motherfucker; so, why would he change his behavior now?
Then there's the difficulty of actually getting a trade accomplished, working with Riley. I think there's a few reasons to believe this could get done.
#1) Gilbert and Arison got a deal done for James; remember, James was traded to Miami, even after "The Letter" -- he didn't sign there as a free agent. Cavs, when faced with the ultimate loss of a franchise player, still got a deal done for picks. I could see the same thing happening in this instance, owner to owner, with the league likely making sure it didn't get nasty.
#2) Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York will likely offer Wade $15M annually; just for veteran presence and leadership, and for the Knicks, Wade makes them a contender from a novice fan's standpoint. So, the Heat don't have the same bargaining position they did last year when no team really had the cap space to sign Wade, and therefore will likely not have the best financial deal available to Wade.
Wade has more leverage this year, than he did last year.
#3) Wade coming to Cleveland gives him a guaranteed Finals appearance, and likely at least 1 more ring. Going anywhere else, include Miami, means retiring with what he has.
#4) No other contender has enough space to sign him. San Antonio doesn't have the space, and Wade would never sign with Golden State in a million years. OKC, if they re-up with Durant, won't have it, and that leaves no other options except Cleveland and potentially New York (lolol).
---- Durant ----
As far as Durant's concerned... the logic there is simple; how many more years does he risk injury?
To minimize the potential risk completely, he'd want to sign a max deal now, losing roughly $50 million dollars in the process.
To mitigate that loss, he can sign a 1+1 year deal with OKC, become a free agent next season, and then sign wherever he wants, only losing the earning potential of +2.5% annual raises. IMHO, this makes the most sense and is very likely what he's going to do.
However, Golden State will not have a 10Y-vet max cap slot available next off season; but substantially less than that since Curry will have a max cap hold of $32.4M + ~$35M for Klay+Draymond, 11 vet min slots @ 1.4M, leaving ~$26.4M in usable cap space. Durant's max salary next offseason will be $37.8M, so GSW will be $11.4M short, and that's with a bench full of vet min players.. Unless Steph and Durant are taking $5M/yr paycuts, it's not happening.
So, if Durant wants to sign with GSW, he has to go this year -- he can't go next year. The most optimal deal he can sign is a 2+1 deal with Golden State, get early Bird rights after year 2, opt-out in year 3, and then sign for the max -- but if he's injured in those 2 years... well, that'd be a shame.
So via this logic, going to Golden State carries significant risk and loss of pay; however...
Durant can sign-and-trade his way to Cleveland. Cleveland would get his Bird Rights, and Durant could sign for the max. He'd have to play an additional year in Cleveland under the $94M cap, but he'd also have an additional year of guaranteed salary (2+1 vs 3+1), so, it somewhat mitigates the loss due to injury but could cost him significant income depending upon how much BRI continues to grow over time.
Since this is getting to be a long post, I'll sum it up this way..
Let's remove health from the equation, and let's assume Durant wants to leave OKC thereby sacrificing maximum earning potential.
That leaves 3 scenarios:
1) BRI/Salary cap contracts massively; in essence, the cap grows by only 6.5% between 2017-18 and 2018-19.
In this case, Durant loses $14.7M over 7 years by signing with Cleveland instead of Golden State. In the first two years, the loss is $0, but he takes a $10M hit in Year 3, and the raises begin to stack from there.
2) BRI/Salary cap contracts moderately; in essence, 2017-18 represents the peak of growth, and we'll see the rate of growth diminish over time gradually.
In this case, Durant would lose ~$1.6M over 7 years by signing with Cleveland; or in other words, an insignificant amount of money, relatively speaking.
3) BRI/Salary cap growth stops completely. Durant's loss would be around $17M over 7 years by signing with Cleveland.