- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
- Messages
- 36,809
- Reaction score
- 94,110
- Points
- 148
Honest to God, it doesn't. The problem may be that I simply don't understand exactly what your position is.
I thought you said you wouldn't play Kizer any more than the last game or two of the season, and that anything more than that would be "irresponsible". You talked about that being the general rule for non-Luck rookie QB's, mentioning Elway and Lynch in Denver.
But then you said that you think the Browns should roll with the "most prepared guy who gives them the best chance to win" which sounds like you might be willing to play the rookie QB if (and I'd agree that it's an "if", not a "when") he happens to be that guy at some point in the season.
So that's my point of confusion. I can't tell whether you're laying down an "absolutely not" or a "we'll have to see how he progresses".
Having watched some Notre Dame and wanting to be excited about Kizer last fall, it would take a minor miracle for DeShone Kizer to be an immediate starter in the NFL. His footwork gets sloppy in live games, leading to throws that are all arm. He also, understandably, didn't make progressions yet. Seeing that he was a two sport star in high school and only played 1 1/2 seasons of college ball, that is to be expected. Drafting him was like the Paxton Lynch pick, in my opinion. The tools are there, but he needs to be taught.
If he passes all the tests much earlier than anyone believes, cool he passed them. I just don't believe it's going to happen until next season, 2018. Not from what I saw last season.