abuC
Sixth Man
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,951
- Reaction score
- 1,663
- Points
- 113
I worry about Hamilton. They masked it in Detroit for years because they had Ben and Chauncey was so good, but he's kind of a defensive liability. He can't defend the bigger guys at all and has trouble containing small guards as well.
Another thing is his game. I think he could potentially fit well into the offense, except his best attribute is running off of screens and being in constant motion and getting his number called. We were supposed to have a guy to run off screens and hit those jumpers all-day, but we get Parker one of those shots on an average of once every 5 games. If we did that with Rip we'd render him ineffective and his contract is a serious concern.
I'd keep my eye on Rip, but I'd also look elsewhere first.
I think the problem is that Parker can't shake people coming off screens now, and unlike Rip when a play breaks down he can't score on his own. They are similar, and Hamilton obviously wouldn't score 18ppg on the Cavs, but I'd think they would make a more concerted effort to get him the ball coming off screens because he can put the ball on the floor for more than one dribble and score if need be. Parker is almost exclusively a catch and shoot/set shooter at this point, he never regularly could create for himself, Hamilton can to a degree.